CourtListener 10156200•State v. Brown
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Walter
Demetrius Brown aka Walter Parker, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-160
Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 12,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
of Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Walter
Demetrius Brown appeals his guilty plea
for shoplifting, maintaining the trial court erred by accepting his plea without
an affirmative showing it was intelligently and voluntarily entered. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Browns appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, SHORT,
and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.