State v. Garza

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Charles E.
Garza, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-158

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 12,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, South Carolina Commission of
Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation,
Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Charles Garza appeals his probation
revocation, arguing the amount of revocation is unconstitutionally disproportionate and constitutes cruel and unusual
punishment.  After a thorough review of
the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] Garza’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.