CourtListener 10156093•State v. Lawter
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Billy Ray
Lawter, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-462
Submitted August 1, 2008 Filed August 8,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Billy Ray Lawter was tried for and convicted of
carjacking. He was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Lawter appeals
his conviction, arguing the circuit court erred in denying his request for a
jury charge on larceny as a lesser included offense of carjacking. Lawters
counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating she had
reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacked merit. After a thorough
review of the record, counsels brief, and Lawters pro se brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Lawters appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, J., CURETON,
A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.