State v. Wilson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Arthur Billy
Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County

 John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-469

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 8,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia, and Solicitor I. McDuffie 
Stone, III, of Beaufort, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Arthur Billy Wilson appeals
a restitution order requiring him to pay $6,919.03.  Wilson argues the court
erred in allowing a document into evidence which the State failed to disclose pursuant
to Rule 5, SCRCrimP.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.