State v. Goss

this Opinion Has No Precedential Value.
It Should not be cited or relied on as precedent in any proceeding except as
provided by rule 268(d)(2), scacr.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jamie Goss
a/k/a James Gause, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-610

Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed
December 22, 2009

Appeal Dismissed

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of
Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jamie Goss appeals his conviction and
sentence for trafficking in crack cocaine.  Goss asserts the trial court erred
in admitting testimony in violation of Rule 1002, SCRE, and in denying his motion
for a new trial based on evidence discovered after trial.   After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Goss's appeal and grant counsel's motion
to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.