State v. Clord Harrell

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clord Harrell, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

Kristi Lee Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-531

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 19, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Clord Harrell appeals his guilty plea to
criminal domestic violence.  On appeal,
Harrell argues his guilty plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Harrell's pro se brief, pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Harrell's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.