State v. Tremon Doctor

CourtListener 10155953Scctapp23 nov. 2009

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tremon L.
Doctor, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-561

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 23, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia; for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tremon L. Doctor appeals his guilty plea
and sentences for carjacking, armed
robbery, and voluntary manslaughter arguing his guilty plea did not comply with
the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief,
and Doctor's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.