CourtListener 10155901•State v. Brannon
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Craig M.
Brannon, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-489
Submitted October 1, 2009 Filed October
21, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Craig M.
Brannon was convicted of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and
was sentenced to life without parole (LWOP). Brannon appeals arguing: (1) the
trial court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict; and (2) the State's
notice of intent to seek LWOP was insufficient. Brannon also filed a pro se
brief. After a thorough
review of the record, counsel's brief, and Brannon's pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.