State v. Campbell

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Saronta F. Campbell, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-423

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
September 3, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Saronta F. Campbell appeals the revocation of his probation.  Campbell argues the evidence
presented at the probation revocation hearing was insufficient for the circuit
court to revoke his probation.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Campbell's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and PIEPER,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.