CourtListener 10155867•State v. Valentine
Texte intégral
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Randy L.
Valentine, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-417
Submitted September 1, 2009 Filed
September 3, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert Mills Ariail, of Greenville, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Randy
L. Valentine appeals his conviction and sentence for throwing bodily fluids in
violation of section 24-13-470 of the South Carolina Code (2007), arguing the
trial court erred in denying his directed verdict motion. After a thorough review of the record, counsel's
brief, and Valentine's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.