State v. Cobb

CourtListener 10155806Scctapp3 juin 2009

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Quincy Cobb, Appellant.

Appeal From Dorchester County

 James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-277

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed June 3, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Quincy
Cobb appeals his guilty pleas and
sentences for first degree burglary and armed robbery, arguing his plea was
involuntary because the plea court never advised him of the minimum sentence.  After a thorough review of the record
and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.