State v. Hernandez

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Gustavo Lara
Hernandez, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-286

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed June 4, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Gustavo
Lara Hernandez appeals from his guilty
plea to identity fraud, arguing his plea did not comply with the mandates of Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.