State v. Waymer

CourtListener 10155788Scctapp4 juin 2009

Texte intégral

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clyde Waymer,
Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Allendale County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-291

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed June 4, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, Appellant.

Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W.
McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and
Solicitor I. McDuffie  Stone, III, of Beaufort, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Clyde
Waymer, Jr., appeals his guilty plea and sentence to two counts of assault upon
an employee of a correctional facility, arguing his plea failed to comply with
constitutional standards.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.