State v. Reese

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ronald Reese, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

 James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-360

Submitted June 1, 2009 – Filed June 24,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott;

all of Columbia,  and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Ronald Reese appeals his guilty plea to distribution
of marijuana within proximity of a school, distribution of marijuana, and
possession with intent to distribute cocaine, second offense.  Reese argues the
trial court erred by accepting his plea because it did not comply with Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.