State v. Lloyd

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brady Lloyd, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-197

Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed May 6,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Brady
Lloyd appeals his conviction and sentence for assault and battery of a high and
aggravated nature and armed robbery.  Lloyd argues the trial court erred by
failing to suppress certain statements he made in phone conversations while he
was in pre-trial detention.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we dismiss[1] Lloyd’s appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.