State v. Deniz

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Enrique Nunez
Deniz, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-202

Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed May 18,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott; and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Enrique
Nunez Deniz appeals his guilty plea to trafficking crack cocaine and failure to
stop for a blue light, and concurrent fifteen year sentences.  Deniz argues the trial court erred by accepting his plea because it
did not comply with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238  (1969).  Deniz also
filed a pro se brief.  After
a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be
relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Hearn,
C.J., Pieper and
Lockemy, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.