CourtListener 10155659•State v. Gaines
Texte intégral
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Mujahid Abdul
Gaines, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-232
Submitted May 1, 2009 Filed May 27, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Mujahid
Abdul Gaines appeals from his guilty plea
to armed robbery, filing a false police report, and failure to stop for a blue
light. On appeal, Gaines argues the plea judge erred in failing to determine
whether Gaines was mentally competent before accepting the plea. Gaines has
also filed a pro se brief. After
a thorough review of the record and both briefs, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.