State v. Huggins

CourtListener 10155615Scctapp30 avr. 2009

Texte intégral

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Yolanda Denise
Huggins, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Michelle J. Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-178

Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed April 30,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney Donald J. Zelenka, and Solicitor
Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Yolanda Denise Huggins appeals her guilty plea and
sentence for breach of trust over $5,000, arguing her plea failed
to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969).  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.