CourtListener 10155599•Davis-Daniels v. The Pines Apartments, L.P.
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Terra
Davis-Daniels, Respondent,
v.
The Pines Apartments,
L.P. and C.L. Holding d/b/a The Pines Apartments a/k/a Colony East Apartments
a/k/a Hunter's Way a/k/a Pinnacle a/k/a Pines at Forest Lake, Defendants,/Of
Whom C.L. Holding is the Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-125
Submitted March 2, 2009 Filed March 5,
2009
AFFIRMED
Karl S. Brehmer and L. Darby Plexico, III, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
William R. Padget and Harry L. Goldberg, both of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: The Pines Apartments, L.P. and C.L. Holding appeal the
circuit courts grant of an amendment of judgment allowing a default judgment
to be amended to reflect C.L. Holdings, LLC as the proper name of C.L. Holding. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 60(a),
SCRCP (Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and
errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court
at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such
notice, if any, as the court orders.); Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v.
Palmetto Ice Co., 303 S.C. 237, 241, 399 S.E.2d 779, 782 (1990) ([W]here
a defendant sued by a wrong name omits to plead in abatement and suffers the
plaintiff to proceed to judgment, though he has never appeared to the wrong
name, this [c]ourt will not interfere to set aside the proceedings.); Tunstall
v. The Lerner Shops, Inc., 160 S.C. 557, 563, 159 S.E. 386, 388 (1931)
(noting a mere misnomer of corporation defendant is immaterial if it appears
that it could not have been, or was not misled).
AFFIRMED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.