State v. Gill

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joequans Ramar
Gill, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-130

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 5,
2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy
Chief Appellate Defender Wanda
H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joequans Ramar Gill pled guilty to criminal sexual
conduct with a minor, second degree, and was sentenced to six years of
community supervision.  One year of Gill’s community supervision was revoked
for use of illegal drugs and for failure to give a complete and truthful
statement concerning his proximity to children.  Gill appeals, arguing the
circuit court erred in revoking a year of his community supervision in light of
mitigating circumstances.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Gill’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.