State v. Mitchell

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bruce Mitchell, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Gordon G. Cooper, Master In Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-006

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed January
7, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Bruce Mitchell appeals his probation revocation and
resulting six-year sentence.  Mitchell argues the probation revocation was so
summary the record is insufficient for review.    After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Mitchell’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.