State v. Greene

CourtListener 10155451Scctapp4 déc. 2008

Texte intégral

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher
Alan Greene, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Roger L. Couch, Special Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-653

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 4, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Katherine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all of Columbia; Solicitor
Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Christopher Alan Green appeals his guilty pleas to two
counts of criminal solicitation of a minor and sentence of two concurrent ten-year
sentences.  He argues the sentence violates Article 1, § 15 of the South
Carolina Constitution because it is cruel and unusual.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Greene’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.