State v. Redden

CourtListener 10155444Scctapp4 déc. 2008

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Danny Redden, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee County

 J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-656

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 4, 2008 

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Danny Redden
was convicted of second degree burglary and sentenced to fifteen years’
imprisonment, suspended on the service of six years, and three years’
probation.  On appeal, Redden argues the trial court erred by failing to direct
a verdict in his favor because the State failed to present evidence he entered the
premises without consent.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Evans v. Wabash Life Ins. Co., 247 S.C. 464, 466, 148 S.E.2d 153, 153 (1966) (finding
where a defendant presents evidence after moving for a directed verdict, the
motion must be renewed to preserve any error for appeal); State v.
Carlson, 363 S.C. 586, 608, 611 S.E.2d 283, 294 (Ct. App. 2005) (finding
appellant has the burden to provide a sufficient record for review or appeal).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.