State v. Ladson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Henry Lee
Ladson, Jr. Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-684

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Henry Ladson, Jr. appeals his pleas of guilty to second-degree burglary, grand
larceny, and petit larceny.  On
appeal, Ladson argues that his guilty pleas failed to comply with Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Ladson’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.