State v. McManus

CourtListener 10155420Scctapp10 déc. 2008

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Justin Noel
McManus, Appellant.

Appeal From Chesterfield County

 Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-681

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Justin Noel McManus appeals
his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and possession of a firearm during
the commission of a violent crime.  He maintains the trial court erred in
failing to instruct the jury on defense of others.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.