CourtListener 10155402•State v. Pitts
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Robert Pitts, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-692
Submitted December 1, 2008 Filed
December 15, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Robert
Pitts appeals his conviction of voluntary manslaughter and thirty-year
sentence. Pitts argues the trial court erred by accepting his guilty plea, pursuant
to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), because the State did
not have substantial evidence proving Pitts guilt. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.