State v. Abercrombie

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leon
Abercrombie, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-711

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 16, 2008 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Leon Abercrombie pled guilty to grand larceny and
second degree burglary.  Abercrombie argues his guilty plea did not comply with
the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). 
Additionally, in his pro se brief, Abercrombie alleges the search of his house
violated his Fourth Amendment rights.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Abercrombie’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.