State v. Ware

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Ware, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

 J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-615

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 10, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and  Solicitor Edgar Lewis
Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Jeffery Ware appeals his
convictions and sentence for one count of stalking and two counts of
harassment.  Ware claims the court erred in allowing a hearsay statement into
evidence made by Ware’s father to the victim.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Ware’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.