CourtListener 10155363•State v. Frady
Texte intégral
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
James Randolph
Frady, Appellant.
Appeal From Oconee County
Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-634
Submitted November 3, 2008 Filed
November 12, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor
Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Frady
appeals his convictions for grand
larceny, first- degree burglary, arson, possession of a weapon during the
commission of a violent crime, and two counts of murder, arguing the trial
court erred by precluding Frady from introducing evidence of third party guilt. After a thorough review of the record and
counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Fradys appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.