State v. Gist

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Terrance Gist, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-551

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
9, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, of
Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Terrance Gist appeals his conviction and sentence for
murder, arguing the trial court erred by allowing the State to engage in
witness-pitting during the cross-examination of a defense witness.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Gist’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.