State v. Adams

CourtListener 10155324Scctapp10 oct. 2008

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tommy Swinson
Adams, Appellant.

Appeal From Edgefield County

 John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-560

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  A
jury found Tommy Swinson Adams guilty of first-degree criminal sexual conduct
with a minor and committing a lewd act on a minor.  Adams argues
the trial judge erred in refusing to grant his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Adams’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.