State v. Vell

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Vell,
A/K/A, Bobby J. Bell, Appellant.

Appeal from Richland County

 Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-584

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
15, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Aileen P. Clare, Appellate Defender, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliot, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
James Vell was convicted of kidnapping and first-degree criminal sexual conduct. On appeal, Vell’s counsel argues the trial
court abused its discretion by forcing him to proceed to trial with appointed
counsel rather than the attorney of his choice.  Vell also filed a pro se brief,
arguing: (1) the trial court prejudiced him by enhancing his sentence after his
request for the attorney of his choice; and (2) the trial court violated his
Due Process rights by sentencing him to consecutive terms for charges
“committed at the same time.”  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Vell’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.