State v. Coleman

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Daniel James
Coleman, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-518

Submitted September 2, 2008 – Filed
September 9, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Daniel Coleman appeals his convictions and sentences
for carjacking and kidnapping.  On appeal, Coleman maintains the trial court erred
by ruling the State did not commit a double jeopardy violation in prosecuting
him for both kidnapping and carjacking regarding the same incident.  Coleman
also asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Collins’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Coleman’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.