State v. Taylor

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Denard Taylor, Appellant.

Appeal from Sumter County

 Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-352

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 10,
2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Robert M. Pachakof Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans
Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Denard Taylor appeared before Judge
Howard P. King in Sumter County for a probation revocation hearing on a
probationary sentence for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. 
The balance of Taylor’s probationary sentence was revoked.  On appeal, Taylor argues his constitutional due process rights were
violated because his probation was revoked without the benefit of a preliminary
hearing.  Taylor did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.