State v. Mann

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Carl Michael
Mann, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-396

Submitted July 1, 2007 – Filed July 15,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,  all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Carl Michael Mann appeals his guilty plea to
possession of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute, second offense,
possession of marijuana, second offense, and unlawful carrying of a pistol. 
Mann was sentenced to concurrent terms of seven, one, and one years,
respectively.  Mann argues his guilty plea was involuntary because it did not
comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969).   After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Mann’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.  

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.