State v. Mathis

CourtListener 10155099Scctapp15 juil. 2008

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Tracy Mathis, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Appeal From Aiken County

Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court
Judge

Doyet A. Early, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-398

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 15,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director of Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara
R. Morgan, of Aiken, and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tracy Mathis appeals his guilty plea and the resulting
revocation of his probation, arguing the trial court erred by sentencing him to
four years imprisonment for breaking into a motor vehicle and revoking his
probation without evidence his failure to report was willful.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Mathis’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.