State v. Young

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Wesly
Young, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

 J. C. “Buddy” Nicholson, Jr., Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-395

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 15,
2008  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans,
Jr., Legal Counsel, and J. Benjamin Aplin, Legal Counsel; all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  James Young appeals
the revocation of his suspended sentence.  Young argues the circuit court
committed an abuse of discretion by revoking his suspended sentence.  Young
contends the circuit court ignored his explanations for why his suspended
sentence should not be revoked.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Young’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.