CourtListener 10155086•State v. Young
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Clifford R.
Young, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Lee County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-407
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 17,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Katherine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Clifford
R. Young, Jr., appeals his guilty plea to criminal sexual conduct with a minor
in the second degree. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment, suspended
upon active service of five years imprisonment and two years probation. Young
argues the trial court erred by accepting his guilty plea without a sufficient
factual basis. Young filed a separate pro se brief arguing the
trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and his trial counsel was
ineffective. After a thorough review of the record and both briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Youngs appeal
and grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.