Anderson v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Phyllis D. Anderson, Appellant,

v.

Louise Williams, Respondent.

Appeal From Richland County

 Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-258

Submitted May 1, 2008 – Filed May 14, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Phyllis D. Anderson, of Columbia,
Pro Se.

Louise Williams, of Columbia,
Pro Se.

PER CURIAM:  Phyllis
D. Anderson appeals the circuit court’s denial of her motion seeking removal of
an oak tree in Louise Williams’ yard.  We dismiss[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 210(h),
SCACR (providing an appellate court will not consider any fact that does not
appear in the record on appeal); Helms Realty, Inc. v. Gibson-Wall Co.,
363 S.C. 334, 339, 611 S.E.2d 485, 487-88 (2005) (finding appellant has the
burden of presenting a sufficient record to allow review); Hamilton v.
Greyhound Lines E., 281 S.C. 442, 444, 316 S.E.2d 368, 369 (1984)
(dismissing the appeal because appellant failed to furnish a sufficient record
from which this court can make an intelligent review); Meek v. Meek, 295 S.C. 222, 225,
367 S.E.2d 704, 706 (Ct. App. 1988) (“Ordinarily, we would dismiss an
appellant’s appeal where he fails to present an adequate record on appeal.”).

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., and SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case
without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.