State v. McClintock

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marcus
McClintock, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Gordon G. Cooper, Master In Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-094

Submitted February 1, 2008 – Filed
February 11, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans,
Jr., Legal Counsel, John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Marcus
McClintock appeals the revocation of his suspended sentence, arguing the trial
court erred in revoking his suspended sentence because there was insufficient
evidence to support a finding he violated the terms of his probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] McClintock’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.