State v. Lasenby

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert B.
Lasenby, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-036

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January
11, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia,  for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert B. Lasenby, Jr. pled guilty to assault with
intent to kill (AWIK) for which he received seven years jail time.  Lasenby
argues the trial judge improperly accepted his plea because the State’s
evidence did not establish the requisite mental state for AWIK.  Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel attached a petition to be
relieved, stating he reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks
merit.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Lasenby’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.