State v. Peeples

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Albert Peeples, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-059

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January
15, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken.

PER CURIAM: 
Albert Peeples (Appellant) pled guilty to driving under the influence.  On
appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final brief along with a petition to
be relieved as counsel.  Appellant has not filed a pro se response.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be
relieved.              

APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1]  This case is decided without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.