CourtListener 10154793•State v. Manning
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Rodney Manning, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-062
Submitted January 1, 2008 Filed January
17, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant,
and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Manning (Appellant) pled guilty to breaking into a motor vehicle and
petit larceny. He was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of three years and
thirty days, respectively. On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final
brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel. Appellant has not filed
a pro se response. After a thorough review of the record
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]
HEARN, C.J., and KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] This case is decided without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.