State v. Fuller

CourtListener 10154781Scctapp6 juin 2012

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Fuller, Appellant.
__________

Appeal From Williamsburg County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-346
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Robert Fuller appeals his guilty plea and sentence,
arguing his guilty plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.