SCDSS v. Marlena A.

CourtListener 10154769Scctapp13 juin 2012

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Marlena A., Jermaine P., Defendants,

Of whom Marlena A. is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Marlena A., Kevin B., Defendants.

In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2011-197867

Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-357
Submitted June 1, 2012 – Filed June 13, 2012
_____________

AFFIRMED

Thomas Bryant Outlaw, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Marlena A. appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.