State v. Cameron

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ronald Francis Cameron, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-254 

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed May 2,
2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor William B. Rogers, Jr., of Bennettsville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Ronald
Francis Cameron appeals his convictions for first-degree burglary and petit
larceny, arguing the trial court erred in granting the State's request that he
submit nontestimonial identification evidence.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and
SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.