State v. Smith

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth
Danafelix Smith, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-178  

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed March 14,
2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,
of Columbia; and Kenneth Danafelix Smith, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald
J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Barnette, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kenneth Danafelix Smith appeals his convictions for murder and breach of peace of a high and aggravated
nature, arguing the trial
court erred in failing to direct a verdict in his favor on its own motion. 
Smith also filed multiple pro se briefs.  After a thorough
review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

PIEPER,
KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.