State v. Alcantara

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Milciades Alcantara, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-108

Submitted February 1, 2012 – Filed
February 22, 2012   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Acting Solicitor Barry Barnette, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Milciades
Alcantara appeals his sentences, arguing the circuit court erred
in imposing a sentence that violated the prohibition against cruel and unusual
punishment.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J.,
HUFF and SHORT, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.