SCDSS v. Shannon

CourtListener 10154265Scctapp10 oct. 2011

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Shannon S. G.,
James D. S. AKA Darryl S., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Shannon
S. G. is the Appellant.

In the
interest of a minor child under the age of 18 years.

Appeal From Darlington County

Roger E. Henderson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-431

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
10, 2011

AFFIRMED

Penny Hays Cauly, of Florence, for Appellant.

Elizabeth Biggerstaff York, of Hartsville, for Respondent.

Robbie Forrester Gardner, III, of Hartsville, for Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Shannon
S. G. appeals from the family court's
final order terminating her parental rights to her child.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a
thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HUFF,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.