State v. Deaner

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher Lee
Deaner, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-472

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
26, 2011   

AFFIRMED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Christopher
Lee Deaner appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion to dismiss, arguing
the circuit court erred in refusing to dismiss the charges against him under
the Interstate Agreement on Detainer Act (IAD) when the State failed to bring
the case to trial or move for a continuance within 180 days from the time
Deaner requested final disposition of his outstanding warrant.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v.
Tucker, 376 S.C. 412, 418, 656 S.E.2d 403, 406-07
(Ct. App. 2008) (holding that by proceeding with a guilty
plea, a defendant implicitly waives "any and all defects regarding his
return to state custody under the IAD").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.